Tag: ixp

Our Community and IXP Manager

I was delighted to help celebrate Euro-IX’s 20th anniversary today by giving a talk on Our Community and IXP Manager. My goal was to show that collaboration is a two-way street with IXP Manager by taking a look at how our community has helped the project and reflect on how the project helps our community.

I was delighted to help celebrate Euro-IX’s 20th anniversary today by giving a talk on Our Community and IXP Manager. My goal was to show that cooperation is a two-way street with IXP Manager by taking a look at how our community has helped the project and reflect on how the project helps our community. The event was of course online and you can find full details here: Euro-IX – 20 Years of Cooperation.

Euro-IX is my favourite event in our industry and I attended my first one on behalf of INEX when it was in Rome in 2009, accompanying the late Barry Rhodes. Since then, I’ve attended at least one of the two every year.

You can download the slides for the talk here which would be useful to follow some of the content below. There is also a video available here.

IXP Manager: Project Status

I began with a brief update on the current status of the IXP Manager project. An image I and the team at INEX take great pride in sharing is the following world view with 166 green dots – each dot representing an IXP that uses IXP Manager.

We, INEX and the IXP Manager project, launched a new website in June 2020. This site has a database backend that stores the 166 IXPs noted above and generates the above image dynamically. On a nightly basis, it also polls these IXPs in one of two ways:

  1. If the IX-F Member Export is enabled and publically available, we will pull the current data from this. This is the case for 98 of the 166 and this data is real-time and accurate.
  2. For the rest, we’ll use PeeringDB which requires networks (members of IXPs) to assert that they peer at an exchange and so these numbers will be a significant undercount.

The resulting stats, as of 27th June 2021, were presented next:

You can always find a live and current version of these here.

Our Community – Giving to IXP Manager

Now we’re getting into the meat of the presentation by looking at some of the things that the Euro-IX – and wider – community give IXP Manager. The first tangible item is community contributions which mostly cover the costs of a full-time developer. This program is currently in its fifth year. Rather than repeating what I said, please see this page on the website for details.

The next slide was about knowledge. This is possibly an under-discussed and under-valued aspect of Euro-IX in general. Knowledge is a very valuable commodity in most industries that is aggressively protected with NDAs, patents, and contracts. Yet, at Euro-IX forums, the operators of IXPs come together to learn; to create knowledge; and to share knowledge – openly and freely. The best of this community knowledge gets distilled into IXP Manager which, as we always say, teaches and implements best practices – and these practices have in part come from this creation and sharing.

One of the things I’m most proud of in our new IXP Manager website is the contributor wall of fame. Anyone who makes at least five contributions to the project through the GitHub platform will appear here which, as of today’s date, has just over 40 people. Any of the following will count towards a contribution:

  1. Possibly the hardest: contribute code through a pull request.
  2. Open an issue (bug report or feature request).
  3. Simply comment on an existing issue (or your own!).
  4. Contribute editorial fixes/content to the documentation.

This section was rounded out with a shortlist of other sources of community collaboration. The first was the coffee breaks between sessions and the conversations over drinks at the socials at Euro-IX forums. These relaxed environments allowed for more long-form free-flowing discussions with IXP Manager users to help flesh out potential features and to understand where the problems, grit, and rough edges exist. The information learned from these conversations then feeds into later versions of IXP Manager. I miss these face-to-face engagements and, hopefully, we can get back to them soon.

Finally, I wanted to give a specific mention to the open-source community in general. Before I was ever involved in IXPs, INEX, or IXP Manager, I had (and continue to have) an involvement in other open-source projects. For IXP Manager, the FOSS community has given us wide-ranging tools from the PHP language itself to Laravel – the web application framework we use, and right through to front-end libraries such as TailwindCSS and jQuery.

Of course, when we mention open-source in the IXP community, we have to give a nod to Bird, the internet routing daemon, which is the powerhouse of so many of our route server implementations. Hopefully, we’ll also find the time in 2021 to add OpenBGPd support to IXP Manager.

IXP Manager – Giving to Our Community

The is the other side of the two-way street and I wanted to touch on some of the things we hope IXP Manager gives our community. This isn’t about new releases, or functionality or features. And it’s not about being boastful or giving ourselves a pat on the back. It’s aspirational – it’s about what we think – what we hope – IXP Manager gives the community. It’s also not something we can claim success for – it’s up to the community to decide if we’ve succeeded here.

This first element of this was our mission statement – our vision / hope for the project and why we open-sourced it:

Our vision for IXP Manager and the basis for making it a free-to-use, open-source project was that it might enable the creation of IXPs where they are required.

The existence of these IXPs would, in turn, create a stronger, open, more robust and better-connected internet.

This very much goes back to the kind of people involved in IXPs. For most of us, the notion of for the good of the internet is part of our DNA.

The next thing I hope IXP Manager gives the exchanges that use it is independence. The independence to build a local community and form the best and most appropriate community-led IXP for the region in which it exists. This is also an anti-colonialism / anti-imperialism measure as we’ve seen a number of the larger IXPs establish IXPs well outside their original countries and regions. To my mind, in most cases, this is not the best way to build IXPs and usually leads to transactional IXPs rather than communities.

I also like to think of IXPs as facilitators – if not even guardians to an extent – of net neutrality. When you have for-profit IXPs then the business motive is wealth creation. That is the very definition of for-profit. When this is your motivation then the decisions you make may not necessarily be to the benefit of all your members – especially the weaker / smaller members.

Something I’m fairly satisfied that IXP Manager does give new IXPs is the best possible start. As well as a good leg-up for smaller IXPs that move to the platform. The concepts of secure by design and best current practices are baked into what IXP Manager does. Of course, an IXP will always need staff with network engineering and system admin skills – but we hope that the steep learning curve is very much flattened by the use of IXP Manager. To the extent that the challenges in starting a new IXP should no longer be technical but rather environmental: regional political and regulatory issues, commercial issues such as funding and data centre contracts, and finding members.

Finally, we hope IXP Manager gives new IXPs credibility. The reason (so they’ve told us) that Facebook, Amazon AWS and Netflix (historically) have supported IXP Manager through patronage is that they see the value in coming to a new exchange that has installed and is making good use of IXP Manager. These content networks know that much of the technical elements will be “done right”.

There’s also a reverse angle to this – reputation protection for the rest of us. There are only a few hundred active IXPs worldwide and we’ve all worked really hard to build confidence in our abilities – most as community-led not-for-profit enterprises – to deliver secure, reliable services. It only takes a small few bad actors (such as cowboys looking for a quick profit or inexperienced operators) to sow the seeds of doubt. I hope IXP Manager helps put a large insurance blanket over the rest of us by helping these new IXPs start out in the best possible way.

Epilogue

Our Euro-IX community not only supports IXP Manager. We all support each other – through the forums, mailing lists and virtual meet-ups. That we are all so willing to share information and experiences so openly is the wonderful thing about Euro-IX. Not just an association but a community. It’s a community I’m proud to be a part of and call so many of its members by friends. Here’s to the next 20 years!

Upgrading Legacy Versions of IXP Manager

Legacy installations of IXP Manager can be very difficult to upgrade as you can find yourself in a dependency nightmare whereby the old version of IXP Manager will not run on modern versions of PHP; and vice versa.

In case you missed it, we have a new modern website for IXP Manager – find it at https://www.ixpmanager.org/. One of the features of this new website is that we now gather IXP Manager usage statistics on a daily basis – including the distribution of versions in use.

Reassuringly, of the installs we can poll for version used, ~65% are using one of the latest three minor versions (5.5.0 – 5.7.0). This is reassuring for a number of reasons including: knowing that IXPs stay current; knowing that IXPs are concerned about security updates; and knowing that the upgrade process is not especially difficult.

Of the 145 installs we know about, we can poll 116 and collect the version is use which yields the following table:

5.x.y83
4.x.y26
3.x.y7
Distribution of major IXP Manager versions in use as at September 8th 2020.

Legacy installations of IXP Manager can be very difficult to upgrade as you can find yourself in a dependency nightmare whereby the old version of IXP Manager will not run on modern versions of PHP; and vice versa.

Community IX Atlanta (CIX-ATL) are in the process of upgrading from 4.9.3 to the latest (5.7.0) and they graciously allowed me to record the process:

The video is a real-life experience where it wasn’t planned in advance allowing the viewer to see the mistakes and thought processes throughout. Also, if you weren’t aware of it, we have an on-going series of IXP Manager tutorials here.

When considering a legacy upgrade, there are two main approaches:

  1. Build a new IXP Manager installation on a new (modern) server and migrate the database (this is what we’ve done here).
  2. Attempt an in place upgrade alternating between IXP Manager upgrades and operating system upgrades. This is probably more awkward with more scope for issues to crop up (especially on non-IXP Manager applications which may be on the same server).

Remember, what’s covered here is “just” the IXP Manager and database upgrade. There’s a bunch of other things that would also need to be done including:

  • Working through the various upgrade actions in the release notes (mentioned throughout the video). Essentially you’ll need to step through each set of release notes for the versions you cycle through (and jump over).
  • If building a new server, pointing elements such as route server cron jobs and other API consumers at the new server.
  • Migrating other applications from the legacy server (e.g. maybe you have mrtg co-installed there).

In a production environment, my goal would be to build the new IXP Manager installation with the copied and upgraded database and run them in parallel. NB: either avoid or duplicate changes made in the UI across both installations of IXP Manager for this period of time.

Once the new installation of IXP Manager is ready for production use, you will then step through all external tools that consume data from it (sflow, mrtg, route servers, route collectors, etc.) and migrate them to the new installation. Sometimes simply updating DNS can achieve most of this but you’ll probably want to take it piece-meal and ensure each external service works as expected.

Take particular care with essential services such as route servers. This is an opportune time to upgrade to Bird v2 and add RPKI. What we did at INEX was do one route server at a time with 1-2 weeks between upgrades. This allowed time to ensure the new system was stable and also to ensure no member issues due to RPKI filtering, etc. (spoiler alert: it was uneventful!).

As you complete the migration, you can also consider if some services should be left on the “old” server. Separating tasks between different servers is good practice and so ask youself if everything should be migrated over to the new server.

More than anything, I hope this video entices you to keep current with your IXP Manager installations!

Using IXP Manager’s Grapher API

We call IXP Manager’s statistics and graphing architecture Grapher. It’s a backend agnostic way to collect and present data. Out of the box, we support MRTG for standard interface graphs, sflow for peer to peer and per-protocol graphs, and Smokeping for latency/packet loss graphs. You can see some of this in action on INEX’s public statistics section.

Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) play a significant role in national internet infrastructures and IXP Manager is used in nearly 100 of these IXPs worldwide. In the last couple weeks we have got a number of queries from those IXPs asking for suggestions on how they can extract traffic data to address queries from their national Governments, regulators, media and members. We just published our own analysis of this for traffic over INEX here.

Grapher has a basic API interface (documented here) which we use to help those IXP Manager users address the queries they are getting. What we have provided to date are mostly quick rough-and-ready solutions but we will pull all these together over the weeks (and months) to come to see which of them might be useful permanent features in IXP Manager.

How to Use These Examples

The code snippets below are expected to be placed in a PHP file in the base directory of your IXP Manager installation (e.g. /srv/ixpmanager) and executed on the command line (e.g. php myscript.php).

Each of these scripts need the following header which is not included below for brevity:

<?php

require 'vendor/autoload.php';

use Carbon\Carbon;

$data = json_decode( file_get_contents( 
    'https://www.inex.ie/ixp/grapher/ixp?period=year&type=log&category=bits' 
) );

We’ve placed a working API endpoint for INEX above – change this for your own IXP / scenario.

Data Volume Growth

An IXP was asked by their largest national newspaper to provide daily statistics of traffic growth due to COVID-19. For historical reasons linked to MRTG graph images, the periods in IXP Manager for this data is such that: day is last 33.3 hours; week is last 8.33 days; month is last 33.33 days; and year is last 366 days.

This is fine within IXP Manager when comparing averages and maximums as we are always comparing like with like. But if we’re looking to sum up the data exchanged in a proper 24hr day then we need to process this differently. For that we use the following loop:

$start = new Carbon('2020-01-01 00:00:00');
$bits = 0;
$last = $data[0][0];
$startu = $start->format('U');
$end = $start->copy()->addDay()->format('U');

foreach( $data as $d ) {
  // if the row is before our start time, skip
  if( $d[0] < $startu ) { $last = $d[0]; continue; }

  if( $d[0] > $end ) {
    // if the row is for the next day break out and print the data 
    echo $start->format('Y-m-d') . ',' 
        . $bits/8 / 1024/1024/1024/1024 . "\n";

    // and reset for next day        
    $bits  = $d[1] * ($d[0] - $last);
    $startu = $start->addDay()->format('U');
    $end    = $start->copy()->addDay()->format('U');
  } else {
    $bits += $d[1] * ($d[0] - $last);
  }

  $last = $d[0];
}

The output is comma-separated (CSV) with the date and data volume exchanged in that 24 hour period (in TBs via 8/1024/1024/1024/1024). This can, for example, be pasted into Excel to create a simple graph:

The elements of the $d[] array mirror what you would expect to find in a MRTG log file (but the data unit represents the API request – e.g. bits/sec, pkts/sec, etc.):

  • d[0] – the UNIX timestamp of the data sample.
  • $d[1] and $d[2] – the average incoming and outgoing transfer rate in bits per second. This is valid for the time between the $d[0] value of the current entry and the $d[0] value of the previous entry. For an IXP where traffic is exchanged, we expect to see $d[1] roughly the same as $d[2].
  • $d[3] and $d[4] – the maximum incoming and outgoing transfer rate in bits per second for the current interval. This is calculated from all the updates which have occured in the current interval. If the current interval is 1 hour, and updates have occured every 5 minutes, it will be the biggest 5 minute transfer rate seen during the hour.

Traffic Peaks

The above snippet uses the average traffic values and the time between samples to calculate the overall volume of traffic exchanged. If you just want to know the traffic peaks in bits/sec on a daily basis, you can do something like this:

$daymax = 0;
$day    = null;

foreach( $data as $d ) {

    $c = ( new Carbon($d[0]) )->format('Y-m-d');

    if( $c !== $day ) {
        if( $day !== null ) {
            echo $day . ',' . $daymax / 1000/1000/1000 . "\n";
        }
        $day = $c;
        $daymax = $d[3];
    } else if( $d[3] > $daymax ) {
        $daymax = $d[3];
    }
}

The output is comma-separated (CSV) with the date and data volume exchanged in that 24 hour period (in Gbps via 1000/1000/1000). This can also be pasted into Excel to create a simple graph:

Import to Carbon / Graphite / Grafana

Something that is on our development list for IXP Manager is to integrate Graphite as a Grapher backend. Using this stack, we could create much more visually appealing graphs as well as time-shift comparisons. In fact this is how we created the graphs for this article on INEX’s website which includes graphs such as:

To create this, we need to get the data into Carbon (Graphite’s time-series database). Carbon accepts data via UDP so we used a script of the form:

foreach( $data as $d ) {
    echo "echo \"inex.ixp.run1 " . $d[1] . " " . $d[0] 
        . "\" | nc <carbon-ip-address> 2003\n";
}

This will output lines like the following which can be piped to sh:

echo "inex.ixp.run1 387495973600 1585649700" | nc -u 192.0.2.23 2003

The Carbon / Graphite / Grafana stack is quite complex so unless you are familiar with it, this option for graphing could prove difficult. To get up and running quickly, we used the docker-grafana-graphite Docker image. Beware that the default graphite/storage-schemas.conf in this image limits data retention to only 7 days.

INEX’s Shiny New Route Servers

Copy of an article I wrote on INEX’s own blog for longevity – original published here on April 10 2019.

In this article, we talk about the new route servers that we deployed across all three peering platforms at INEX during February 2019 and, particularly, RPKI support.

Most route server instances at internet exchanges (IXPs) perform prefix filtering based on route/route6 objects published by internet routing registries (IRRDBs). INEX members would be used to creating these through RIPE’s database. However there are many other registries and the data quality of some of these IRRDB objects is often poor, with problems relating to missing, stale and incorrectly duplicated information.

A typical IRRDB entry would resemble the following:

route:          192.0.2.0/24
descr:          Example IPv4 route object
origin:         AS65500
created:        2004-12-06T11:43:57Z
last-modified:  2016-11-16T22:19:51Z
source:         SOME-IRRDB

RPKI

RPKI is a public key infrastructure framework designed to secure the internet’s routing infrastructure in a way that replaces IRRs with a database where trust is assigned by the resource holder. The equivalent of a route object in RPKI is called a ROA (Route Origin Authorisation). It is a cryptographically secure triplet of information which represents a route, the AS that originates it and the maximum prefix length that may be advertised. An example of an IPv4 and an IPv6 ROA would be:

( Origin AS,  Prefix,         Max Length )
( AS65500,    2001:db8::/32,  /48        )
( AS65501,    192.0.2.0/24,   /24        )

ROAs are typically created through your own RIR (so, RIPE for most INEX members). These RIRs are called trust anchors in RPKI. RIPE have created an extremely easy wizard for creating ROAs through the LIR Portal.

To implement RPKI in a router, the router needs to build and maintain a table of verified ROAs from the five RIRs/trust anchors. The easiest way of doing this is to use a local cache server which pulls and validates the ROAs from the trust anchors and uses a new protocol called RPKI-RTR to feed that information to routers. Currently there are three validators: RIPE’s RPKI Validator v3; Routinator 3000 from NLnetLabs; and Cloudflare’s GoRTR. INEX currently uses the former two.

RPKI validation of a route against the table of ROAs yields one of three possible results:

  • VALID: a ROA exists for the route and both the prefix length is within the allowed range and the origin ASN matches.
  • INVALID: a ROA exists for the route but either (or both) the prefix length is outside the allowed range and/or the origin ASN is different.
  • UNKNOWN: no ROA exists for the route.

UNKNOWN is a common response as the database has only a fraction of the prefix coverage as IRR databases do. We are now in a multi-year transition from IRR to RPKI route validation while ROAs are created.

Bird V2

As well as RPKI support, we have also upgrading all route servers to Bird v2.

This is a significant rewrite to Bird which, for v1, maintained separate code and daemons for IPv4 and IPv6. Bird v2 merges these code bases and also introduces support for new SAFIs such as l3vpns / mpls.

Overall, the configuration changes required were minimal and INEX continues to run separate daemons of Bird v2 for IPv4 and IPv6 daemons. Route servers are CPU intensive and separate daemons allows for maximum stability, keeps the configuration clean and fits into the existing deployment processes we have built up with IXP Manager.

Route Server Filtering Flow

Our work on the new route servers will be released to the community as part of IXP Manager v5 shortly. The new filtering flow is enumerated below. One of the key new features is that if any route fails a step, we use internal large community tagging to indicate this and the specific reason to our members through the IXP Manager looking glass (more on that later).

  1. Filter small prefixes (>/24 for IPv4, >/48 for IPv6).
  2. Filter martian / bogon ranges.
  3. Sanity check to ensure the AS path has at least one ASN and no more than 64.
  4. Sanity check to ensure the peer ASN is the same as first ASN in the prefix’s AS path.
  5. Prevent next-hop hijacking (where a member advertises a route but puts the next hop as another member’s router rather than their own). We do allow same-AS’s to specify their other router(s).
  6. Filter known transit networks.
  7. Ensure that the origin AS is in set of ASNs from member’s AS-SET. See below for some additional detail on this.
  8. RPKI validation. If it is RPKI VALID, accept the route. If it is RPKI INVALID then filter it.
  9. If the route is RPKI UNKNOWN, revert to standard IRRDB filtering.

Regarding step 7 above, an AS-SET is another type of IRRDB database entry where a network which also acts as a transit provider for other networks can enumerate the AS numbers of those downstream networks. This is something RPKI does not yet support but it is being worked on – see AS-Cones.

Lastly we have enhanced the BGP large community support to allow our members request as-path prepends on announcements to specific members over the route servers. For these and more supported communities, see the INEX route server page here.

Bird’s Eye and the Looking Glass

As well as IXP Manager, INEX has also written and open sourced a secure micro service for querying Bird daemons called Bird’s Eye. IXP Manager uses this to provide a web-based looking glass into our route collectors and servers. We have recently released v1.2.1 of Bird’s Eye which adds support for Bird v2.

We have greatly enhanced IXP Manager’s looking glass to support both Bird v2 and the large communities we use to tag filtered reasons. You can explore any of INEX’s route servers to see this yourself – for example this is route server #1 for IPv4 on INEX LAN1. When members log into IXP Manager they will also find a new Filtered Prefixes tool which will summarise any filtered routes across all 12 of INEX’s route server instances.

More Information

We have spoken about this at a number of conferences recently:

A Brief History of IXP Manager

For another INEX project, I was asked to put together a timeline for IXP Manager – an open source application for managing Internet eXchange Points. Reproduced here:

IXP Manager was originally a web portal written in PHP by Nick Hilliard in 2005. It was a basic database frontend that just did fairly simple CRUD (CReate, Update, Delete operations) and allowed our members to log in and view their traffic usage graphs.

Around this was a ton of Perl scripts that sucked that data out of the the database and created configuration files for route collectors, graphing, monitoring, etc.

The major achievement of Nick’s original system was the database design (the schema). The core of that schema is still the core of IXP Manager over 10 years later.

I started in INEX in 2007 and started to expand IXP Manager using what was becoming a more modern web development paradigm – Model/View/Controller with a framework called Zend Framework.

There wasn’t a grand plan here – it was just “as we needed” organic growth over the coming years.

In 2010 we decided what we had was actually pretty good and could be very useful for other IXPs. We got committee approval to open source the software and we released IXP Manager V2 in 2010 under the GPL2 license (GNU Public License v2).

This license essentially means anyone can use the software free of charge but also that they should contribute back improvements that they may make. The idea being that INEX would eventually benefit from other IXPs contributing to the project.

Open sourcing a project doesn’t mean it’ll be successful though! What we didn’t do in 2010 was put infrastructure around it such as: presentations at IXP conferences, mailing lists for user support, decent documentation, etc.

We corrected all that and re-released an updated version called IXP Manager v3 in 2012. This time it took off! We also started collaborating with ISOC (The Internet Society) around this time to help start-up IXPs (mainly eastern Europe and Africa) use IXP Manager.

Some established IXPs also contributed money towards development of missing features – most notably LONAP in the UK – and these new features fed back into INEX.

We’ve worked hard on v3 and it’s developed well since with many new features and improvements. Sometime in late 2016 – maybe even this month – we’ll release v4 which is a major leap forward again and should hopefully attract new users and developers.

INEX is very well regarded in the IXP community as an exchange that is well run and both operates and teaches best practice. All of what we’ve learnt running a good exchange has fed into IXP Manager and it helps those IXPs that use it to implement those same good practices. IXP Manager has helped raise INEX’s reputation even further.

Lately we’ve begun to realise that as a small team we can’t do it all ourselves – the more exchanges that use it, the more requests for help and features we receive and as a result, new developments take a back seat.

To try and improve this we launched a new website in 2016 – http://www.ixpmanager.org/ – and issued a call for sponsorship so we could hire a full time developer. The ‘we’ here by the way is my and Nick’s own company – Island Bridge Networks. We’re doing this on a purely cost recovery basis. I’m delighted to say we’ve just about reached our funding goal with three top line sponsors all contributing about €20k each – ISOC, Netflix and SwissIX. The hiring process has now begun!

I’m also delighted to say that there are 33 exchanges around the world using IXP Manager /that we know of/.

Personal Profile for INEX

I was asked to write a personal profile for INEX in <= 300 words. Reproduced here.

If you want to confuse Barry, ask him where he’s from: born in Cork, spent his formative years in Galway and married into Dublin. He got a honours degree in Maths, his first love, from NUI, Galway in 2001 and went on to do four years research in information theory in UCD’s Computer Science department.

In 2005 he took a job with imag!ne to help build their ADSL broadband service from scratch to a position where it supported tens of thousands of subscribers. Barry branched out on his own in 2007 when he formed his own consultancy business, Open Solutions, which continued working with imag!ne as well as building up a portfolio of network, VoIP and web application development customers.

It was 2008 when Nick Hilliard, INEX’s CTO, approached Barry to provide a couple days operational support to INEX. Little did Barry realise what a huge part of his life INEX would become – both here in Ireland supporting INEX’s infrastructure and membership but also as part of the larger European and international IXP community.

Barry is the lead developer of IXP Manager (http://www.ixpmanager.org/) – a full stack management system for IXPs which includes an administration and customer portal; provides end to end provisioning; and both teaches and implements best practice. INEX is very proud to say that this project is now in use at over 33 IXPs and has grown legs of its own with the wider community sponsoring a full-time developer.

INEX has always been happy to help other IXPs and, through our relationship with the Internet Society (ISOC), RIPE and Euro-IX, Barry has travelled to countries with a less developed internet infrastructure to advise on best practice, has delivered a number of IXP Manager workshops and contributes to policy development.

IXP Manager – Planning for v4

A lot has changed in the 3 to 5 years that the decision was made to use certain libraries / technologies / methods on IXP Manager.

In previous major version changes we made some serious architecture changes in one sweep. For example v2 -> v3 saw the complete migration from Doctrine ORM v1 to v2 (which was a change from the Active Record pattern to the Data Mapper pattern).

Today, IXP Manager is a very large project and to do such a sweeping migration in one go would stifle development, break something that isn’t actually broken and take a lot of time.

But, sticking with older technologies and libraries has negative effects also. It creates developer apathy (for which I can personally vouch for). It also provides a major stumbling block for bringing on new developers and contributors (who wants to learn Zend Framework 1 now which has been EOL’d for sometime?).

So, our plan for v4 is to bring in new technologies without throwing away or rewriting everything we have.

IXP Manager is a MVC application that currently uses Doctrine2 as the Model, Smarty as the View and ZF1 as the Controller. Doctrine2 is still current and won’t be changing.

Smarty will remain as the view engine for current / unmigrated functionality. But Smarty is… oh my God… soooooo bad. v4 will default to Twig which is more modern and far better structured from a programming point of view. Coupled with the new framework, it will also allow for a nicer means of skinning. For the interested, Twig has some very nice features including layouts, macros and also some nice security features.

ZF1 has served us well but it’s been EOL’d and is now quite outdated. The new hotness in PHP is Laravel, which I’ve been using to great effect for a while now. Laravel show cases some of the new and best functionality of PHP and using very modern techniques (such as IoC).

But more importantly, Laravel will let us do things in a much different and much more flexible manner for the IXPs using IXP Manager. Some of these include:

  •  Job queues: built-in and simple (to use) support for job queues via Beanstalkd and others. Queuing jobs will provide functionality that we at INEX have been looking for (and it’s also an FAQ from other IXPs) -> reconfiguring services on demand (or, at least quicker than a twice daily cronjob).

Put this together with:

  • Events: Laravel allows us to trigger events and subscribe to them.

A key example of queue and event functionality would be that a change to a VLAN interface (such as checking the route server client box) would trigger a vlan interface changed event. One subscriber to this event would be the route server configuration manager. Based on the VLAN change, this event handler can then queue events. The route servers themselves would monitor these queues and rebuild / reconfigure the route servers appropriately on demand.

Similar handlers for route collectors, DNS ARPA changes, etc. can offer much more real time control of all the services at an IXP.

IoC decouples logic from the controller. What this means is that IXPs who want to do things differently than INEX (let’s say use Cacti instead of MRTG as an example), can swap out MRTG with Cacti with one line of code (that’s assuming we write contracts – interfaces – for such handlers and a Cacti version is coded of course!). But that’s the kind of power and flexibility we’re looking to bring in.

Other features Laravel provides includes:

  • Much improved unit testing on controller actions. Right now, we spin up Apache and MySQL to test controller actions. This is no longer required with Laravel making tests easier to write, more robust and more focused with built in support for mock objects.
  • A much nicer and more structured way of creating command line interfaces rather than the quite clunky way we have of doing it currently.
  • A much more natural way to develop REST API endpoints with json:api compatible responses.

And that leads us to the front end. Right now, the front end and the back end are tightly coupled. During the development lifetime of v4, we want to move more towards an API is Everything back end with a decoupled front end.

This separation will again aid unit testing providing a more reliable and robust IXP Manager. It will allow other IXPs to create their own front end on member facing portals or, even, move to IXP Manager as their back end system but retaining investment of current member portals by adding new features from IXP Manager through API endpoints. It will also allow existing systems in IXPs to integrate with IXP Manager to provision services and ports for example.

One of the bigger tests of this plan will be the (long awaited and badly needed) revamp of the member facing area. We’re currently planning the UI / UX of this to deliver key information to members in the best way possible. This will include Bootstrap v3 which is fluid from the ground up so mobile browsers to wide screen browsers should be supported naturally.

During the early stages of v4, we’ll create the API endpoints necessary to support the member portal functions and then create a front end on that using Ember.js.

Other changes in v4 will include:

  • A switch from package management via Git sub-modules to composer and Packagist as is current standard practice.
  • Introduction of Bower for front end asset management.
  • And we’ll need a task runner for pulling everything together – for that we’ll use Grunt (although that’ll mostly be a development / release prep tool rather than an end user requirement).

So, that’s what we’re looking at! It won’t happen overnight but we’ll continue our policy of release early, release often and we’ll update the documentation and provide complete upgrade instructions at the appropriate times. Some of the above is also subject to change depending on practical experience / issues as we move towards it.

Comments, ideas, etc. are all welcome.

Peering Week Articles on trefor.net

I spent the first few days of St Patrick’s week last month in Leeds at the first of the two annual Euro-IX conferences on behalf of INEX. Trefor Davies, of trefor.net, organised a series of articles called Peering Week on his blog to coincide with it:

During Peering Week we have had 18 excellent contributions from some of the people who run the internet in Europe. This might sound dramatic especially considering that the internet is made up of sixty or seventy thousand Autonomous Networks. The contributors this week run Internet Exchanges where a greats many of these networks connect to each other.

My contribution was about our IXP management system called IXP Manager – co-written by myself and Nick Hilliard for INEX. This tool is now being used to manage two IXPs in the UK, at least five more across Europe, a couple that we know about in the US and it is now the de facto choice for IXPs in Africa and Asia – where we are working with ISOC.

You can read the full article on Tref’s blog here: INEX’s IXP Manager – tools to help manage an Internet Exchange.

I’m glad to say that the good folks at Euro-IX helped ensure I wasn’t too homesick on St. Patricks’s Day – as the days proceedings wrapped up, we were greeted by:

guinness_array_header

Bird / Quagga with MD5 Support for IPv4/6 on FreeBSD & Linux

Over in INEX we run a route server cluster which alleviates the burden of setting up bilateral peering sessions for the more than 80% of the members that use them. The current hardware is now about six years old and we have a forklift upgrade in the works.

BGP allows for MD5 authentication between clients (using the TCP MD5 signature option, see RFC 2385) and – while recently obsoleted in RFC 5925 – it is still widely used in shared LAN mediums such as IXPs; primarily to prevent packet spoofing and session hijacking via recycled IP addresses.

Our current route server implementation runs on FreeBSD which does not support TCP MD5 in its stock kernel (you are required to compile a custom kernel – see below for details). Additionally, specifying the session MD5 is not done in the BGP daemon configuration but separately in the IPsec configuration. Lastly, our current FreeBSD version has no support for TCP MD5  over IPv6. These have all led to unnecessarily complex configurations and a degree of confusion.

Because of this, we decided to test up to date Linux and FreeBSD versions for native IPv4 and IPv6 TCP MD5 support with Bird and Quagga (our route server daemons of choice).

In each case, BGP sessions were tested for:

  • no MD5 on each end (expected to work);
  • same MD5 on each end (expected to work);
  • different MD5 on each end (expected not to work); and
  • MD5 on one end with no MD5 on the other end (expected not to work).

For Linux, the platform chosen was Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with the stock 3.2.0-40-generic kernel.

  • Sessions were tested for Quagga to Quagga and Quagga to Bird;
  • Sessions were tested over both IPv4 and IPv6;
  • The presence of valid MD5 signatures were confirmed using tcpdump -M xxx;
  • Stock Quagga and Bird from the 12.04 apt repositories were used.

The results - everything worked and worked as expected:

  • BGP sessions only established when expected (no MD5 configured, same MD5 configured);
  • This held for both IPv4 and IPv6.

Summary: Linux will support TCP MD5 nativily for IPv4 and IPv6 when using Quagga or Bird.

For FreeBSD, we used the latest production release of 9.1. TCP MD5 support is not compiled in by default so a custom kernel must be built with the additional options of:

options   TCP_SIGNATURE
options   IPSEC
device    crypto
device    cryptodev

In addition to this, the MD5 shared secrets need to be added to the IPsec SA/SD database via the setkey utility or, preferably, via the /etc/ipsec.conf file which, for example, would contain entries for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses such as:

add 192.0.2.1 192.0.2.2 tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "supersecret1";
add 2001:db8::1 2001:db8::2 tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "supersecret2";

where the addresses ending in .1/:1 are local and .2/:2 are the BGP neighbor addresses. This file can be processed by setting ipsec_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and executing /etc/rc.d/ipsec reload.

  • Sessions were tested for Quagga/Linux to Quagga/FreeBSD and  from Quagga/Linux to Bird/FreeBSD;
  • Sessions were tested over both IPv4 and IPv6;
  • The presence of valid MD5 signatures were confirmed using tcpdump -M xxx;
  • Stock Quagga from the 12.04 apt repositories and stock Quagga and Bird from FreeBSD ports were used.

The results – almost everything worked and worked as expected:

  • BGP sessions only established when expected (no MD5 configured, same MD5 configured);
  • This held for both IPv4 and IPv6;
  • one odd but expected behavior – you only need to set the MD5 via setkey / ipsec.conf – setting it (or not) in the Quagga and Bird config has no effect so long as it is set via setkey (but is useful for documentation purposes). However, trying to set it in Quagga without having rebuilt the kernel will result in an error.

Summary: FreeBSD will support TCP MD5 via a custom kernel and setkey / ipsec.conf for IPv4 and IPv6. Note that there is an additional complexity when changing or removing MD5 passwords as these need to be amended / deleted via setkey which can put an extra burden on automatic route server configuration generators.

What the Hell is INEX? An IXP?

In a few recent posts, I’ve mentioned INEX.

INEX is a neutral, industry-owned association, founded in 1996, that provides IP peering facilities for its members. INEX membership is open to all organisations that can benefit from peering their IP traffic and there are currently 57 members.

INEX can also be considered Ireland’s IP Peering Hub. INEX membership provides high-speed, reliable and resilient IP traffic exchange facilities for both Irish and International organisations, allowing them to route IP traffic efficiently thereby providing faster, more reliable and lower-latency internet access for their customers.

So what the hell is an IXP? Well, Euro-IX commissioned the following, the Internet Revealed: A file about IXPs, a couple of years ago which brilliantly explains IXPs.